Thursday, March 29, 2007
Wednesday, March 28, 2007
Popular Myths
Open Letter to those who wish to have my vote for Law Society of Upper Canada Bencher
Tuesday, March 27, 2007
Quebec
Wednesday, March 21, 2007
Tuesday, March 20, 2007
More on the budget and Canadian politics proper for once.
Oh...And Here's Where They Stand At The Moment To Win The Whole Enchilada
| |||
Candidate | Party | Price | Change |
D | 24.30 | +0.000 | |
R | 21.60 | +0.000 | |
D | 18.00 | +0.000 | |
R | 13.50 | +0.000 | |
R | 7.80 | +0.000 | |
D | 7.10 | +0.000 | |
D | 6.50 | +0.000 | |
R | 0.60 | +0.000 | |
D | 0.50 | +0.000 |
When to Shut Up
We had ourselves a budget
Saturday, March 17, 2007
Friday, March 16, 2007
Amazing New Technology: Email Address
Dismissive Thrust meet Eye Rolling Parry
Thursday, March 15, 2007
Hey Readers
Khalid Sheikh Mohammed
Wednesday, March 14, 2007
Slamming the Spammers
Cicero the Prescient. Cicero for...President?
Last week I was talking politics with some colleagues from work - telling them how I thought the 2008 Presidential Election would go down and how I thought it was a bad idea to rule out a win by second tier or late entrants. One reason I cited strongly was my belief that 2008 would be the first Presidential Youtube election. In short, there is a certain randomness added to this election because any gaffe said on the campaign trail or any policy shift from previous campaigns, can end up on Youtube. Today's Daily Telegraph makes the same point. Of course we all know this isn't the first time this has happened. George Allen has already been felled by it. One thing we can know for sure - he won't be the last.
While most of this Youtube development is incredibly positive and will help to keep politicians accountable, there is also a fairly strong negative. No one can be their best selves every minute of every day. In this election either John McCain or Hillary Clinton could lose the election simply for pulling their wedgied underwear out of their ass on the way from a car to a door. That's the kind of thing I'm talking about. Of course we could have a whole other discussion about what kind on idiot you must be to not vote for someone because of something like that... or for an ill timed high pitched crescendo scream. But I wouldn't want to say uncharitable things about the American electorate...
Tuesday, March 13, 2007
and check this one out too...
Counterpoint: British Resources Savaging the Great Global Warming Swindle
I'm really not trying to turn this into a climate change blog. Honest.
...But for my little audience, a couple of interesting links.
- New York Times is questioning Gore's exaggerations.
- A documentary by Britain's Channel 4 called The Great Global Warming Swindle. As an honest thinker, if you watched an Inconvenient Truth you are hereby obliged to watch this as well.
Random Stuff
- Some needed relief in my home town. Congrats guys. Sorry it took so long.
- More global warming skepticism from the National Post's Lorne Gunter. With apologies to the true believers. Thanks for the link go to my dear sainted father. Ah what the heck - have a look at the National Post's entire series on it.
Citizen Black + Interpretive Dancers = Vindication?
Check this out:
This morning on the bus, I find the following newslet in this morning's Metro
CHICAGO -- When Conrad Black sits before the jury that will decide his fate on fraud charges, observers say his lawyers likely want him facing artists, writers and others who "see nuance," rather than blue-collar workers with a firm faith in the chain of command. Prosecutors will be looking for "law-and-order, follow-the-rules type\ s who also believe in chain of command and that the buck stops at the top." (Here's a link to a longer version I found later in the London Free Press)
I almost laughed out loud in my seat. I've been a proponent of the belief that Conrad Black has been getting a raw deal for some time now. But if this is his defence teams jury strategy then it may be about to get rawer (yep, I know that it isn't a word. thanks.) Conrad Black is a bete noir to the left. Artists and writers are almost uniformly leftist. They have absolutely no history of seeing nuance when thinking about class struggle and rich grumpy looking old men who remind them of robber baron villains and trophy wives who've been recently painted as Imelda Marcos lite.
And who said blue collar people don't see nuance? There are an AWFUL LOT of blue collar people out there and an AWFUL LOT of them have no problem seeing nuance. Maybe these lawyers should meet some.
Finally, WWHD gentlemen. What Would Howard Roarke Do? I don't call myself a Randian anymore (I guess I'm a lawyer who can't help seeing nuances) but there is a scene near the end of The Fountainhead that might prove instructive.
Alright - I'm being a little cheeky with that last part - but suffice it to say, this jury strategy - as articulated in the press - seems dodgy. Looking for people who see nuance is quite wise - but an attempt to find nuanced people based on their profession and with no mind to their ideological prejudices could easily backfire. It is so dodgy in fact, that I doubt that his incredibly competent and well remunerated team has such a simple minded strategy. Methinks the observers may be moderately off base.
But hey - what do I know? That Rona Ambrose decision of the PM seems to have turned out just fine for him - contrary to what I would have had you believe . She's snug as a bug in a rug and quiet as a church mouse (and as comfortable as a folksy old cliche?).
Friday, March 9, 2007
Social Networking
Emily Yoffe from Slate tries out the virtues of Facebook as a 50 year old. Is social networking for all ages? Personally I'm very impressed with Facebook. It is not a toy. It is a utility. Basically it isn't your stereo, it's your fax. It is a series of interlocking connections linked to your email that lets people stay in touch instead of drifting apart. Lots of silly fun at first. Then just very very useful. Man, I love the Internet. I LOOOOOOVE IT.
Thursday, March 8, 2007
Ironic isn't it?
Quebec ElectioMffffph Mfffffph!!
Tuesday, March 6, 2007
Cell Phone Number Portability in Canada. Finally.
This is just a public service announcement. As of March 14, 2007 you will be able to keep your phone number when switching mobile service providers in Canada. About bloody time. This should lead to increased competition and better prices. So ummm... don't sign any long term cell phone contracts in the next week.